🔗 Share this article

In the eyes of Natalia Molina and third-generation Mexican American, the most memorable moment of the baseball championship did not occur during the nail-biting finale last Saturday, when her team pulled off one death-defying escape feat after another before winning in overtime over the Toronto Blue Jays.

It came a game earlier, when two second-tier athletes, the Puerto Rican player and Miguel Rojas, executed a electrifying, game-winning sequence that simultaneously challenged many harmful stereotypes touted about Latinos in recent decades.

The moment in itself was breathtaking: Hernández raced in from left field to catch a ball he at first lost in the bright lights, then threw it to the infield to record another, decisive out. Rojas, at second base, caught the ball moments before a runner collided with him, knocking him backwards.

This was not just a remarkable athletic moment, possibly the key shift in the series in the team's direction after looking for much of the games like the weaker side. For Molina, it was thrilling, on multiple levels, a badly needed morale boost for the community and for the city after a period of immigration raids, troops monitoring the neighborhoods, and a constant stream of negativity from national leaders.

"The players presented this counter-narrative," explained Molina. "The world witnessed Latinos displaying an contagious enthusiasm in what they do, acting as key figures on the team, exhibiting a distinct kind of confidence. They are energetic, they're cheering, they're removing their shirts."

"This represented such a contrast with what we observe on the news – raids, Latinos thrown to the ground and pursued. It is so easy to be demoralized these days."

However, it's entirely straightforward to be a Dodgers fan these days – for Molina or for the many of other fans who attend faithfully to home games and fill up as many as half of the venue's 50,000 seats each time.

A Mixed Connection with the Organization

After intensified immigration raids began in Los Angeles in early June, and military units were deployed into the area to respond to resulting protests, two of the city's sports clubs promptly issued statements of support with affected communities – but not the Dodgers.

Management has said the Dodgers prefer to steer clear of political issues – a stance influenced, possibly, by the reality that a sizable portion of the supporters, even some Hispanic fans, are supporters of current political figures. After considerable external demands, the organization subsequently committed $1m in aid for families directly impacted by the raids but issued no official criticism of the administration.

White House Event and Past Legacy

Three months before, the organization did not hesitate in accepting an offer to celebrate their 2024 World Series win at the official residence – a decision that sports columnists described as "pathetic … weak … and contradictory", given the team's boast in having been the first professional franchise to break the racial segregation in the mid-20th century and the regular invocations of that legacy and the values it embodies by officials and present and former players. Several team members including the coach had expressed reluctance to go to the event during the initial period but then reconsidered or gave in to pressure from the organization.

Corporate Control and Supporter Conflicts

A further issue for fans is that the team are controlled by a large investment group, Guggenheim Partners, whose equity holdings, as per media reports and its own published financial documents, include a share in a private prison corporation that operates detention centers. Guggenheim's leadership has stated many times that it aims to stay out of political matters, but its critics say the silence – and the investment – are their own type of compliance to current policies.

These factors add up to considerable mixed feelings among Hispanic supporters in particular – feelings that emerged even in the euphoria of this season's hard-won World Series victory and the following outpouring of Dodgers support across the city.

"Is it okay to support the team?" area columnist one observer agonized at the beginning of the playoffs in an thoughtful article ruminating on "Dodger blue in our blood, but uncertainty in our hearts". He couldn't ultimately bring himself to view the World Series, but he still felt deeply, to the point that he decided his personal protest must have given the squad the fortune it required to succeed.

Distinguishing the Team from the Owners

Numerous supporters who have similar reservations seem to have decided that they can keep to back the players and its lineup of international players, including the Japanese megastar a key player, while expressing disdain on the team's business leadership. Nowhere was this more clear than at the championship parade at Dodger Stadium on Monday, when the packed audience roared in support of the coach and his players but booed the team president and the chief executive of the ownership group.

"These men in suits don't get to take our boys in blue from us," the fan said. "We've been with the team for more time than they have."

Historical Context and Community Effect

The problem, however, goes further than just the team's present owners. The deal that moved the former franchise to Los Angeles in the late 1950s required the city razing three working-class Hispanic communities on a hill above the city center and then transferring the property to the organization for a small part of its market value. A track on a mid-2000s record that documents the events has an low-income worker at the venue stating that the home he forfeited to eviction is now a part of the field.

Gustavo Arellano, perhaps southern California most widely followed Latino writer and media personality, sees a more troubling side to the lengthy, problematic dynamic between the team and its audience. He describes the Dodgers the popular snack of baseball, "a corporate entity with an excessive, even unhealthy following by numerous Latinos" that has been exploiting its fans for decades.

"They have acted around Latino fans while profiting from them with the other hand for so much time because they have been able to avoid consequences," the writer noted over the summer, when calls to boycott the organization over its absence of response to the raids were contradicted by the awkward fact that turnout at matches remained steady, even at the peak of the protests when the city center was subject to a evening curfew.

International Players and Fan Bonds

Distinguishing the squad from its corporate owners is not a simple task, {