🔗 Share this article

When I am a DM, I historically avoided significant use of luck during my D&D games. I preferred was for story direction and session development to be shaped by character actions instead of the roll of a die. However, I opted to alter my method, and I'm very pleased with the outcome.

The Spark: Seeing a Custom Mechanic

A popular streamed game utilizes a DM who often calls for "luck rolls" from the participants. He does this by choosing a type of die and assigning potential outcomes based on the roll. This is at its core no unlike using a random table, these are devised spontaneously when a character's decision doesn't have a clear conclusion.

I chose to experiment with this method at my own session, primarily because it looked interesting and provided a departure from my normal practice. The outcome were eye-opening, prompting me to reconsider the ongoing tension between planning and improvisation in a tabletop session.

A Memorable Session Moment

At a session, my party had concluded a city-wide fight. Later, a player asked about two key NPCs—a pair—had made it. Instead of picking a fate, I let the dice decide. I told the player to roll a d20. The stakes were: on a 1-4, both were killed; on a 5-9, a single one would die; on a 10+, they survived.

Fate decreed a 4. This led to a profoundly emotional moment where the characters found the corpses of their friends, forever clasped together in death. The party held a ceremony, which was especially powerful due to earlier roleplaying. As a parting touch, I chose that the NPCs' bodies were suddenly restored, containing a enchanted item. I randomized, the item's contained spell was perfectly what the group required to solve another critical quest obstacle. One just orchestrate these kinds of perfect story beats.

Honing DM Agility

This event caused me to question if randomization and spontaneity are in fact the core of D&D. Although you are a meticulously planning DM, your improvisation muscles may atrophy. Adventurers often find joy in upending the most carefully laid plans. Therefore, a good DM must be able to adapt swiftly and create content in real-time.

Utilizing similar mechanics is a great way to practice these skills without straying too much outside your usual style. The strategy is to deploy them for small-scale situations that have a limited impact on the campaign's main plot. To illustrate, I wouldn't use it to establish if the central plot figure is a secret enemy. However, I might use it to determine if the characters arrive just in time to see a critical event takes place.

Enhancing Player Agency

Spontaneous randomization also serves to keep players engaged and cultivate the feeling that the story is responsive, progressing according to their choices immediately. It prevents the perception that they are merely actors in a DM's sole narrative, thereby enhancing the cooperative foundation of the game.

This philosophy has always been integral to the core of D&D. The game's roots were enamored with encounter generators, which made sense for a playstyle focused on treasure hunting. Although current D&D often focuses on plot-driven play, leading many DMs to feel they require detailed plans, that may not be the best approach.

Finding the Sweet Spot

It is perfectly no problem with thorough preparation. But, it's also fine no issue with relinquishing control and permitting the rolls to determine certain outcomes rather than you. Control is a major part of a DM's job. We need it to manage the world, yet we can be reluctant to cede it, in situations where doing so might improve the game.

A piece of suggestion is this: Don't be afraid of relinquishing a bit of your plan. Try a little improvisation for minor details. The result could create that the unexpected outcome is infinitely more rewarding than anything you would have planned by yourself.